Personal Notes: It seems that one thing is lacking and that is J.J. misunderstanding of the criminal element of our so called Federal occupiers. He is very careful to make sure that you understand that he is no " Tax protester" and that one must File. That being the exception, this book hits right on. He also give contact information for establishing a New Mexico Limited Liability company that is very reasonable in price as opposed to the thousands of FRN's that others are charging. On Page 107 he gives an answer to the question
" Can I avoid giving my social security number on the basis of Revelation, chapter 13?"
His Answer:
I assume you are referring to the belief, held sincerely by some, that a SS number is "the mark of the beast". it is true that , in the past several persons have won court cases objecting on religious grounds to state requirements for a SS number in collection to receiving a driver;s license. In Leahy v District of Columbia, the circuit court upheld John C Leahy's religious conviction to providing his SS number in order to get a driver's license.
Later, 5 plaintiff sued the City of Los Angeles on religious objection grounds, objecting to the states requirement that driver's license applicants must provide a SS number as a condition to getting a license. They won the case in the State Superior Court, but i have since heard the state appealed that decision.
An October 25th 1997, a headline in the LA TIMES said "Religious Objections to DMV UPHELD' The subtitle was "Judge Says Five Men Do Not Need Social Security Number's To Get Licenses. They Contend That The Identification I The Satanic 'Mark of The Beast'" by John Dart.
I get the feeling that JJ does not agree with their theology but he does stand up for their convictions. He tells his readers if their true religious convictions is in agreement with these 5 individuals then stand your ground, but if not he states " Join the rest of US who do furnish the number when ever absolutely necessary,.. but never otherwise.
My Advice is the same, EXCEPT IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A NUMBER. THE NUMBER IS NOT MANDATORY to HAVE. JJ Seems to think that it IS. In this I believe he is wrong. I Also believe that if you "got a Number" but did so under threat of coercion, or were simply LIED to in order to get you to get one. that you DO NOT ACTUALLY HAVE ONE. No agreement has legal binding, regardless what a bunch of SS number possessing judges say, when done under fraud, coercion or threat.
NOTE: YOU do not have a SS number, The Number is a number assigned to YOU, the NUMBER is the property of and creation of the Government. It shows you as a Number. You are their property. Same way you would number your property, the Government seeks to number its.


0 comments:
Post a Comment