Monday, September 26, 2005

Socialist Security and the Invasion of the Body Snatchers

Another interesting thing about the Socialist Security System is its international one would flavour. I was sent an articletoday and followed the references to official publications and found out that The United States Great Britton and Northern Ireland have basically combined their systems to integrate with each other. Very interesting indeed. read your invasion of privacy for yourself and then adjust yourself accordingly
Full Text on website
http://www.hmso.gov.uk/si/si1997/97177801.htm
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

I recieved this article from a News Group that I Belong to on yahoo called "NO SS" at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_SSN/ please join for great update information.
I have written for more information on this subject and anti-christ tyranny and await confirmation. If anyone reading this has more onfo, please foward to this blog.
the Preacher...

Sent: Friday, August 12, 2005 5:42 AM
Subject: Injustice, anyone?

Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005
From: acbcomp
Subject: local computer tech ordered in contemp for not getting SS# and birth certificate for child.

A local programer/computer tech, has been charged with 4 charges of
contempt, for refusing to enroll his child into the SSN system and a
birth certificate.

He has all the documentation stating that it is voluntary, yet a court in C d' A is demanding this, with fines and to put him in jail and continue jail until he folds and complies. ....

Martin Peck


EDITED: Martin Contacted me and asked to have his email removed and the Link removed as it is no longer valid. But he also said and I quote:

"I never went to jail, I never paid any sort of fines, and I have not enslaved my son."

Amen

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

An interesting and revealing quote from that nice man who lied to America about the WMD in Iraq....


[Colin Powell] -
"Finding the Russian scientists may be a problem being that Russia does not have
a Social Security System, as here in America, that allows us to MONITOR, TRACK
DOWN and CAPTURE an American citizen."

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

A Desperate Cry from a freedom loviong man wanting to be an AMERICAN without being a SLAVE.

Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 8:23 PM


Hi, I pulled ur article from a NO_SSN search. It is very interesting.

I am 24 year old man from Africa. I am married to a U.S. citizen since 4 years ago. I have also been waiting for my immigration paper during that time.

I can't renew my driver's license without a SSN, and I cannot work. My hands are tied, and my wife is tired of supporting me. I do my best to put bread on the table without an SSN, but I lost that job. Now I am desperate for an other no success in 3 month.
I need help or advice.

Thank you very much for listening, because everywhere I go, they ask for appointment.

Thanks

Tony Montana
tonyscarface@excite.com

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

The Folloowing is from an article that I posted a while back on another site. The issue of Privacy is not big issue in this article, economics is. That being said there is no free economics with out real privacy in your financial dealings. Social Security is the great Slave maker. Slaves have NO privacy.
The Preacher..

http://www.mises.org/fullstory.aspx?Id=1695 this is for the rest of
the article... below is just a portion of the article.. I recomend
surfing about this site and get yourselves a real education on
economics...

In Christ Preaching Freedom

".....Social Security is as economically and morally objectionable
as any other form of forced redistribution, from public housing to
corporate subsidies to warfare, but made worse by the subterfuge that
it is an insurance program of some sort. Once we get that clear in
our minds, how to deal with it becomes clearer as well. It needs to
be zeroed out and replaced by laissez-faire, precisely as saving for
later years has always occurred in the whole of human history.

There are more resources available than ever before to make this
work, from the simplest to the most complex financial tools, and more
personal wealth available for most everyone to live out their old age
in comfort. In fact, Social Security hardly figures into the
retirement plans of most young people today, as well it shouldn't.

More people than ever have a good reason to support the idea of
letting it die or killing it. There are many ways to do this, with
either big or small steps. Let people opt out completely. Cut payroll
taxes. Raise the retirement age. Means test benefits. Establish a cut
off for paying liabilities and end the program. Make the program part
of federal budgeting so the charade will stop. Above all, tell the
truth (as Hans Sennholz says). All of this would be fine. But this is
not what is being discussed, despite all the talk of freedom and
choice.

In the abstract, the idea of private accounts replacing a government
boondoggle sounds good, even great. Other countries have done it; why
not here? Actually, other national conversions did not have anywhere
near the liability problem the US has; Chile, for example, had its
inflated away. Why not let the power of free enterprise work on
behalf of all of us as we get old? Sounds great, but that is not
what's being proposed.

Look a bit closer and you see a big problem, namely that the current
program is not merely a government-run retirement scheme that can be
converted to a private system. It is a transfer program from working
people to retired people. All that nonsense about how much the
government owes you, how much the system has accumulated for you to
enjoy later on, is an accounting fiction.

When people stop paying in, people will stop receiving. It is as
simple as that.

In other words, there is no there to privatize. What is actually
being talked about is the creation of a new national program of
forced savings, complete with a guaranteed minimum income. It is to
be created out of whole cloth using the revenue that would usually be
funneled to retirees. Not that anyone is going to be denied what they
believe is theirs. The money will continue to flow to older Americans
but not come from present revenue. It will come from new funds. And
where are these funds going to come from? Among those who favor
privatization, there are two camps: the left-wing suggests more taxes
and the right-wing suggests more debt."...

0 comments: